How to increase rent with a Section 13 notice in England: the Form 4A rules, two months’ notice, the 52-week gap, and how tenants challenge it at tribunal.
.jpg)
Written by
Ben Luxon
PUBLISHED ON
April 16, 2025
UPDATED ON
September 5, 2026
READ TIME
0 min
Read summarised version with:
To increase the rent on an assured tenancy in England you serve a Section 13 notice on the prescribed Form 4A, giving at least two months' notice, and no sooner than 52 weeks after the last increase took effect. Since 1 May 2026 this is the only lawful route. Rent review clauses no longer work, informal agreements no longer work, and Form 4 is now the social housing form rather than the private one.
The short version:
A Section 13 notice is the statutory document a landlord serves to propose a new rent on an assured periodic tenancy. It is named after section 13 of the Housing Act 1988, and since 1 May 2026 it is the only mechanism by which rent on such a tenancy can lawfully go up without a tribunal determination.
That last point is the change most landlords have not caught up with. Section 13(4A) now says the rent for a period cannot be greater than the rent for the previous period except by a Section 13 notice, a tribunal determination, or a written agreement following a tribunal determination for a lower rent. Anything else in your tenancy agreement that purports to raise the rent has no effect.
Because assured shorthold tenancies were abolished on the same date and all assured tenancies are now periodic, there is no longer a fixed term to work around. Every private assured tenancy in England is in scope.
Form 4A. This is the single most common way a well-intentioned rent increase gets thrown out, so it is worth being precise.
Always download the current version from the GOV.UK assured tenancy forms page immediately before you serve. Prescribed forms are revised from time to time, and a saved copy from last year may already be out of date. For the same reason, avoid third-party template sites: a large number of them are still circulating the pre-May-2026 Form 4.
You can serve one where all of the following are true.
You cannot serve one to give effect to a rent review clause, because those clauses have had no effect since 1 May 2026, and you cannot serve a second one inside the 52-week window.
One transitional trap worth checking. If you raised the rent using a contractual review clause before 1 May 2026, a Section 13 notice served afterwards cannot propose a new rent taking effect within 52 weeks of that earlier increase. An increase that was agreed before 1 May 2026 but was due to take effect after it does not apply at all, so the rent you can build from is the pre-agreement figure.
At least two months, for every periodic tenancy, regardless of whether rent is paid weekly, monthly, quarterly or annually.
This replaced the old sliding scale on 1 May 2026. The previous rules required one month for weekly and monthly tenancies and six months for annual ones. Those figures are no longer lawful, and a notice built on them is invalid. There is now a single period and no variation by payment frequency.
Once every 52 weeks, counted in weeks rather than calendar months.
The new rent cannot take effect earlier than 52 weeks after the date the previous increase took effect. It is not the tenancy anniversary and it is not "the same date next year". Fifty-two weeks drifts against the calendar, so a landlord who diarises a fixed calendar date will eventually serve a notice a few days early and invalidate it. Work from the last effective date plus 52 weeks.
The notice must be in writing. It can be handed over in person, sent by post allowing extra time for delivery, or emailed where the tenancy agreement permits service by email. Keep proof either way, whether that is a recorded delivery receipt, a written acknowledgement, or a saved sent email. If the increase is challenged, service is the first thing examined.
Any one of these is enough. The consequence in each case is the same: the old rent continues and you serve again from scratch.
Tribunals do sometimes exercise discretion over minor slips. In Usher v Theodore Stevenage Limited (CAM/26UH/MRA/2026/0004, 17 July 2026) a notice was held valid despite a discrepancy in the stated tenancy start date. That is discretion, though, not entitlement, and it is not something to rely on.
.jpg)
Nothing further is needed. The tenant begins paying the new figure on the date given in the notice. There is no requirement for the tenant to sign or return anything, and silence counts as acceptance.
The tenant can apply to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) for a determination of open market rent. The mechanics changed substantially on 1 May 2026 and now sit as follows.
Under section 14ZB(5) the tribunal sets the new rent at the lower of the rent you proposed and the open market rent. Two consequences follow.
Open market rent under section 14 means the rent the property might reasonably be expected to achieve if let today on the open market, on a tenancy with the same periods and the same terms other than rent. The tribunal disregards the fact a sitting tenant is in place, improvements the tenant made themselves, and any reduction in value caused by the tenant's own breach.
In practice the case turns on comparable evidence, and the early decisions show the tribunal shaving rather than slashing. In Usher the landlord proposed £1,675 against an existing rent of £1,282 and the tribunal determined £1,550, with £75 deducted for separately charged parking. In Segal v Koroglu (LON/00AM/MNR/2026/0378, 10 July 2026) £1,700 was proposed and £1,650 determined, with £50 deducted for a missing room thermostat and the condition of the windows. A further decision reported in July 2026 involving build-to-rent landlord Get Living gave less weight to the tenant's advertised comparables on the basis that asking prices do not show what rent was actually achieved. Achieved rents carry more weight than listings, and that cuts both ways.
Our guide to evidencing open market rent covers what a tribunal will actually accept, and we have looked at how challenge volumes have moved since the Act came in.
There is also a separate exposure worth knowing about. Under section 14(A1) a tenant can ask the tribunal to determine the rent on a new tenancy without any increase notice having been served at all, provided they apply within six months of the tenancy beginning. Set an opening rent above market and it can be attacked in the first half-year.
If the notice was valid and the tenant neither paid nor applied to the tribunal before the start date, the new rent is legally due and the shortfall is arrears. Deal with it as arrears rather than as a dispute about the increase: confirm in writing what is owed from which date, and follow the usual escalation. Our guide to handling late rent sets out the steps.
The practical failure mode here is quieter than a refusal. If your records still show the old rent, a payment at the old figure looks like a full payment and the arrears accumulate unnoticed for months. Landlord Studio lets you schedule the rent change in advance so the new amount applies from the right date, then flags the shortfall the first month it appears. It also keeps the notice itself filed against the tenancy, which is what you need if the increase is ever questioned, and keeps the income record straight for Making Tax Digital.
No. Section 13 and Form 4A are England only. Using them elsewhere in the UK produces an invalid notice.
None of the four nations imposes a cap on the amount. There is more detail on the regional differences in our guide to rent increases across the UK.
Form 4A. It is the prescribed form for private rented sector assured tenancies in England. Form 4 still exists but is now the social housing form, and serving it on a private tenancy invalidates the notice.
At least two months, for every periodic tenancy, whatever the rent payment frequency. The old one-month and six-month periods stopped applying on 1 May 2026.
No. The new rent cannot take effect less than 52 weeks after the previous increase took effect, and no increase is possible inside the first 52 weeks of the tenancy.
No. Since 1 May 2026, section 13(4A) means rent can only rise by a Section 13 notice, a tribunal determination, or a written agreement following a tribunal determination for a lower rent. Rent review clauses in existing tenancy agreements have no effect.
A tenant cannot simply decline to pay a validly served increase, but they can apply to the First-tier Tribunal before the start date for a determination of open market rent. The tribunal will set the rent at the lower of your proposed figure and market rent, and cannot set it higher than you asked for.
The question no longer arises in England. Fixed-term assured tenancies were abolished on 1 May 2026 and all assured tenancies are now periodic, so Section 13 is the only route.